Continuity priorities
Discuss which services matter most, who owns them and which dependencies require closer examination.
Increasing your cyber security & data resilience.

Operational resilience and recovery
Bring critical services, recovery arrangements, data availability and workforce assumptions into one assessment. Identify what needs attention and what evidence will help establish actual readiness.
Operational Cyber Resilience concerns the capabilities you have to sustain and restore the business through cyber disruption.
Through a consultant-led Guided Assessment, OCRR examines existing arrangements and the assumptions that connect technology, data and people with business operations. Agreed disruption conditions provide a context for reviewing those capabilities; they do not forecast a particular attack.
Discuss which services matter most, who owns them and which dependencies require closer examination.
Consider the relationship between restoring devices or data and restoring services that employees can actually use.
| Operational question | OCRR contribution | Evidence to take forward |
|---|---|---|
| Which services need attention first? | Highlights operational consequences and recovery priorities for discussion. | Critical-service ownership, dependencies and business objectives. |
| Will data recovery support the business? | Considers recovery objectives, availability, integrity, backup and retention. | Restore evidence, trustworthy data and service requirements. |
| Can our people keep working? | Makes productivity, additional workload and specialist support requirements visible. | Staffing assumptions and the practical capacity of workarounds. |
| What recovery scope are we assuming? | Compares prioritised and whole-estate recovery assumptions with workforce and financial implications. | Restoration tests, application and network dependencies, and usable service validation. |
| Which change should we investigate? | Uses Guided versus Elevated comparisons to explore improvement options and trade-offs. | Implementation feasibility, complete costs and evidence of the proposed effect. |
| Can we improve our incident response capability and timelines? | Uses Guided versus Elevated comparisons to appraise agreed changes to response and recovery arrangements, resource assumptions and service restoration priorities. | Current incident-response plans, escalation ownership, exercise findings and validated response and recovery timings. |
Review prioritised recovery and full-estate recovery together. A target or device count needs context: which employees regain usable access, which data is available and which applications and networks must also function?
OCRR helps make recovery time objective (RTO) assumptions, productive capacity and financial implications part of the same discussion. The underlying service dependencies and practical restoration performance need separate validation.
Refine the initial industry baseline with your environment, policy and recovery information through Guided.
Bring service owners, operations, finance and security together around capability findings.
Compare proposed improvements through Elevated, then obtain operational evidence for implementation decisions.
OCRR can add business and investment context to capability reviews and incident-response planning. It supports prioritisation alongside the specialist response, assurance and testing work your organisation needs.
Explore the Cyber Defense Matrix, MITRE ATT&CK and incident-response alignments →
Clarity today. A more resilient tomorrow.
Start with a no-cost, industry-based Executive Summary. Then decide whether to refine the assessment around your organisation and explore improvement options.
Privacy Policy - Click here to see our privacy policy
SynergySix Flow Chains™ is a trademark of Synergy Six Degrees Limited. No copying or distribution without the expressed consent of Synergy Six Degrees.